1001 Straight Guys

Update:

10/20:  For the next couple weeks I’m going to be working on the display of the model information.  Right now, it’s a big mess!

10/13:  Got the rest of the solos in for 2007.  Next come the fuck scenes for 2007!  Check it out and let me know what you think!

10/07:  Added more solos for 2007.  Found a bug where the model information doesn’t copy.  It’ll be fixed.

10/06: Started to add the solos for 2007!  Check them out!

================

9/29

I’m busy making my new blog, but if you want to get a sneak peek

CLICK HERE

Disclaimers:

It is still in a very rough state.  Not all buttons work, but those for models, visit site, and see site updates work.

I’m still loading data.  I started with Chaos Men’s 2006 models.  The tour on Chaos Men only has a limited number of updates (about a year I think).  However, these models were on the site as of this update.  Remember, they’re from 2006 so you’ll have to scroll back some (Chaos Men has A LOT of updates!).

I’m currently working on cleaning up the data, pic sizes, etc.  So, you might see some things and think WTF?!

Finally, I would LOVE to hear what your thoughts are.  You can write me at tedvonfishnchips(@t)gmail(dot)com

SORRY I’M GONE, BUT CHECK OUT 1001 Men And Ted!

ALSO, I’M STARTING A NEW BLOG.

CLICK HERE NOW TO CHECK OUT DAILY MAN WHORE BLOG!

The new 2257 regulations for adult content were published.  The record keeping required of secondary producers (e.g. websites like this) is too much for me to be bothered with.

It falls under the category of “nothing might go wrong, but if it does it will be a huge fuck-up if it explodes in my face”.

Here are the new regulations.

Of course, this doesn’t clean up the internet.  It just makes it a hassle for webmasters based in the United States.

You may ask:

WHY ARE OTHER SITES UP?!

Ask them.  They might not be based in the US.  They might be willing to take a larger risk than myself.

SURELY YOU’RE BEING TOO LITERAL WITH THE LAW!

Maybe.  However, I don’t have any expendable income to spend on a lawyer to help me interpret it.  The law defines sexually explicit conduct as:

(A) * * * actual or simulated–(i) sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex; (ii) bestiality; (iii) masturbation; (iv) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (v) lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person;
(B) For purposes of subsection 8(B) of this section [part of the definition of “child pornography”], “sexually explicit conduct” means–(i) graphic sexual intercourse, including genital-genital, oral-genital, anal-genital, or oral-anal, whether between persons of the same or opposite sex, or lascivious simulated sexual intercourse where the genitals, breast, or pubic area of any person is exhibited; (ii) graphic or lascivious simulated; (I) bestiality;
(II) masturbation; or (III) sadistic or masochistic abuse; or (iii) graphic or simulated lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of any person * * *.

If masturbation wasn’t considered sexually explicit I might be a bit more brave.

YOU’RE OVER REACTING

Maybe.  I might be, but people who are violating the law face 5 years for each offense.  So, an update with 10 images are subject to as much as 50 years of prison.

IT’S GOING TO BE OVERTURNED

Great!  Call me when the dust has settled.